Letters to the Editor
September 2001
| Homepage | About Us | Contact Us | News | Urban Amusements | ||||
| Earthwatch | Letter From Mexico | Hungry? | Advertising Rates | Garden Cuttings | ||||
| Herbal Remedies | Under the Flight Path | Birdwatcher | Letters to the Editor |
Airport position
I am writing to comment on your August 2001 article about airport
issues (He said, she said: Candidates and activists discuss airport positions,
which also appears in this issue).
Unfortunately, the article failed to mention that its author was a
public supporter of one of my opponents. Disclosure of that conflict of interest would
only be fair.
In addition, three of the four commentators you asked to evaluate the
candidates are avowed supporters of my opponents.
The 1996 resolution I supported called for the land-banking for a new
airport. Because the airport is near capacity, I continue to believe we need to plan for a
new airport.
As mayor, I would personally represent Minneapolis residents as a
member of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. I would send a strong message to the MAC
and Northwest Airlines that changes will be necessary to protect the residents in South
Minneapolis.
Lisa McDonald
City council member,
Mayoral candidate
Missed candidate coverage
One of the candidates your paper unfortunately
omitted from your coverage of the 6th Ward Minneapolis City Council race is Tamir Nolley.
He is endorsed by both the Grassroots and Independence parties. Unlike other candidates in
the race, he did not attempt to seek the the DFLs endorsement. The DFL is the party
that has been in charge of this city while our communitys supply of affordable
housing has dwindled to ever more miniscule levels and racial profiling and police
brutality continued unabated.
Robert Halfhill
Minneapolis
Dutch Elm disease
Your article about the folks trying to bring back a disease resistant
Dutch Elm is not good news for gardeners. This invader from Northern Europe is the curse
of the western world. If youve ever tried to pull an elm seedling out by the roots
youll know what I mean. An elm is a nice shade tree but so are most trees.
I dream of a day when our boulevards and our yards are edible
landscapes and not just decorative. In fact this is one of the many tactics we must adapt
if we want to have any chance of slowing global warming. We could get a big portion of our
foods from our boulevards and yards and less from South America or California. There is
not a good reason why our boulevards cannot be lined with Toka plums or pear trees. Maybe
even a few of the White oaks with their eminently edible acorns. Or maybe more of the
sugar bearing sugar maples. Even mulberries that are so necessary for our dwindling
songbird population would be better than the invasive and pesty Dutch Elm.
Don Johnson
Minneapolis