| |
What is the School Board doing now?
by Ed Felien
Just a few weeks ago the School Board was planning
to tear down Sanford Middle School (where they just spent $6 million
in renovation) and build a new school on the site of the second
oldest community garden in the country—dating back to the
Victory Gardens of World War II.
After a huge public outcry, they’re thinking about re-thinking
that move.
Now, they have appointed Dave Jennings as Superintendent of Public
Schools for Minneapolis.
Why would they appoint a former head of the Republican Party to
lead the schools in a heavily Democratic city?
Why would they appoint a white male to lead a school system that
that now counts a non-white majority and furthermore a person who
voted against making Martin Luther King Day a State holiday and
who voted against sanctions for South Africa when it was practicing
apartheid?
Why would they appoint someone with no education experience and
no education credentials to run an education system
School Board Member Denny Schapiro, normally a sensible guy, describes
Jennings as “a good, experienced, savvy political leader when
the Minneapolis schools—and the very idea of public education
as we know it—are under extreme pressure.”
It’s true. We are under extremist pressure.
The Minneapolis school system is under attack from the Republican
governor and the Republican-controlled House at the State Legislature.
So is Hennepin County Medical Center. So is the Park System. So
is City government. The governor and the House hate the City. And
it’s a mean hatred. They hate the City like a younger brother
hates an older brother who’s always made fun of him. They
hate the City because they have a nagging inferiority complex. They
hate the City because they think it gets too much money (even though
it’s been pointed out to them that the City actually pays
more in state taxes than it gets back). It’s a mean, irrational
hatred. It’s the younger brother getting even for being younger.
So, it makes sense to appoint someone who could talk to those people
in St. Paul. Doesn’t it?
Leaving aside the tactical question of whether it makes sense to
appoint a general from the opposing army in the middle of a battle,
let’s look at an even more basic question: Do the Republicans
consider Dave Jennings a good Republican? He was head of the Republican
Party at one time. He was the Republican Speaker of the House in
1985. Surely, those are good enough credentials, aren’t they?
Let’s go back to 1985. The State House was evenly divided
because one representative was an Independent and he wanted to hold
out until he could milk both sides for whatever was possible. Jennings
was the highest bidder, so the Independent joined the Republicans
in electing him speaker. But nothing else got done in that session.
In fact, it was probably the most do-nothing Legislature in Minnesota’s
history. State Senator Linda Berglin, who was serving in the House
at that time, says, “It was crazy. It was hard to get anything
done. Jennings wasn’t a very good Speaker. He was supposed
to keep order, and the House almost broke into a riot at one point.
He left the Legislature soon after that. Went back home to run Schwan’s
Ice Cream. They had a salmonella outbreak, and it took a while to
find out where it came from. I was shocked to see him get the job
as superintendent. When I knew him he never struck me as being a
great advocate for Minneapolis kids.”
But has he maintained good contacts with the Republican Party?
The Republican Party has denounced him. They protested to Almanac
that Jennings was being chosen to represent Republicans when the
party felt he was way out of line. During the last election he supported
Roger Moe for governor, not Tim Pawlenty. How much love and kindness
does that buy from the man in charge of drawing up your budget?
So, it seems, the reason the School Board appointed Jennings is
his political credibility with the governor and the State House,
which turns out to be his major liability.
The School Board hates him more than they hate us.
But the School Board didn’t want public input on this one.
They went off on a retreat and talked to each other, and they came
up with the brilliant idea of appointing the man who was making
them feel good at the retreat.
Ordinary people might think that was being arrogant and elitist.
|
|