|
|
The new Plantation Economy
BY STAN GOTLIEB
Way before George Washington became a slave owner,
the Spanish were using kidnapped Africans in Hispañola (Haiti
and the Dominican Republic) and later in the Gulf Coast states of
Campeche, Veracruz and Yucatan, to raise hennequen and sugar cane.
This was after the local population of Mayan and other native peoples
had proven to be “untrainable,” and before the slaves
were freed by Spanish decree and replaced by Mexican mestizos.
The horrible circumstances of the “free”
work force have been documented in many publications, including
and especially those of B. Traven. Workers were nothing more than
indentured slaves, flogged (literally) by their work bosses, living
in hovels, denied medical care and cheated at the company store.
Union organizers, when discovered, were jailed, disappeared, and
left to swing from trees as an example to those who might have “rebellious”
thoughts.
Eventually, the great plantations of southern
Mexico disappeared, as Capital found cheaper supplies elsewhere.
Some of the old Haciendas still exist, as tourist attractions and
luxury hotels. Last month, the Mexican government announced plans
to bring the big plantations back, and a new “law” was
passed to promote and to subsidize the growing and processing of
cane—for ethanol.
One can argue that the whole push for ethanol is a shuck laid on
us by big petroleum and agribusiness for their own profits; that
“biofuels” will not do much to improve the environment;
that the use of corn for ethanol will disproportionately drive up
the cost of living for the poorest among us—who do not have
automobiles—due to rising prices of food; or that the whole
business is a distraction meant to keep us from concentrating on
replacing cars with public transportation. All of these issues and
more are worthy of an ongoing public debate. But meanwhile, the
reality is that the transnational energy and agribusiness corporations
that are promoting bio-fuels are going ahead with their plans to
produce and market ethanol, using corn, cane and palm, among other
crops, as a source; and that there are enormous quantities of money
in the pipeline for those who can bring these sources on line.
While Mexico is “fortunate” to have
vast cleared areas ready for planting (unlike Brazil, for example,
where expansion of biofuel growth means massive clear-cutting of
old-growth rainforests), it will not escape other ecological disasters
that accompany ethanol production, chief among them being the overuse
of water, as well as pollution of the water table with pesticides
and the waste generated in the process of converting cane to ethanol.
The most unfortunate part of the scheme, at least in the “short
run” will be the return to the plantation economy and the
part it will play in the “Plan Puebla Panama” (PPP).
PPP is the foundation for the total exploitation
of Mexico’s natural resources by the transnationals. It includes
a series of hydroelectric dams and wind farms, and a high-speed
“railway canal” (which will destroy the majority of
the last remaining rain forest in southern Oaxaca state) across
the narrow Isthmus of Tehuantepec—which are displacing tens
of thousands of Oaxacans from their land. The electricity generated
will run the trains, and provide power for the refineries that will
convert the cane to ethanol.
Given the track record of the current administration,
there is little doubt that the worst excesses of the plantation
system will return along with the cane fields. Felipe Calderón
and his cronies are out to give away as much of the country as they
can to the transnationals, and they are clearly willing to put down
any opposition with massive force, as they did in Oaxaca in November.
They have already gutted the pension system for government employees,
known as ISSTE in its Spanish initials, and recently passed some
“reforms” to the criminal codes that will make it easier
for them to arrest legitimate protesters as “terrorists”
and sentence them to decades of imprisonment for “threatening
commerce.”
In this new era of heightened oppression, with a vast pool of unemployed
workers available in Yucatan state and little hope of organizing
them, the march backward to the plantation seems inevitable.
|
|
|