Coleman’s bill pits local
law enforcement against feds

BY DENNIS GEISINGER
About a dozen demonstrators showed up at the
Minnesota office of U.S. Senator Norm Coleman yesterday to protest
the most recent U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s
(ICE) raid, this one in Austin, Minn., and to oppose Coleman’s
proposed amendment to congressional immigration legislation that
would nullify the right of local communities to choose whether or
not they want to join in the enforcement of federal immigration
law.
Of the 20 arrests made during the May 31 raids
in Austin, eight were undocumented aliens with criminal convictions—five
with previous drunk driving arrests, two with previous immigration
violations and one who had been convicted of identity theft in Iowa.
One of the five DWI offenders, Gilberto Alejo-Ubaldo, 20, a citizen
of Mexico, had convictions for “aggravated forgery, driving
without a license, indecent exposure and interference with privacy/surreptitious
intrusion,” according to an ICE press release.
The remaining 12 were arrested after ICE agents
knocked on doors in Austin and were given permission to enter residences
thought to be housing targeted offenders, according to ICE spokesman
Tim Counts.
“The arrests in Austin were part of our ‘Operation Secure
Streets,’” said Counts. Operation Secure Streets is
a national initiative targeting immigrants with prior DUI convictions.
“That’s what they were securing
us from—drunk drivers?” said Kristen Melby, a regional
organizer for Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Coalition (MIRA),
whose members put together Monday’s protest. “Did they
go house to house and roust white drunk drivers?”
Charting inroads into racial profiling has cost
some authorities dearly. A July 1998 story in The Arizona Republic
said that “American-born Hispanics and legal residents charge[d]
that their civil rights were violated when they were randomly stopped
by police without cause. A group of them filed a $35 million federal
lawsuit against the city [of Chandler, Ariz.] and another group
followed with a second lawsuit.”
After an Arizona Attorney General’s “searing
critique” of the police operation, the bill for the city of
Chandler’s own investigation into the matter surpassed $87,000.
Senator Norm Coleman’s amendment to proposed federal immigration
law is “an effort to strengthen national security,”
according to a press release. Coleman says cities are using “a
loophole” to keep their employees from questioning or detaining
people about their immigration status, and he wants to change that.
City ordinances passed in Minneapolis in 2003 and St. Paul in 2004
that prohibit their involvement in immigration enforcement are two
such “loopholes.”
“These aren’t sanctuary ordinances;
they are public health and safety ordinances,” said Alberto
Monserrate, President of Latino Communications Network, in a prepared
statement. “The Coleman amendment say[s] that Congress knows
better than local governments what best protects their residents.
People who look or sound foreign will be the ones whose citizenship
or immigration status will be questioned,” he said.
In recent news archives, former police chiefs
in both Minneapolis and St. Paul have said that the use of their
officers as agents of federal immigration policy would both aggravate
the difficulty in getting immigrants to report crime and to work
with the police and would add a large burden to already strained
resources.
At least 68 state or local governmental entities have adopted similar
non-involvement ordinances, according to Minnesota Advocates for
Human Rights.
“What kind of climate do these immigration policies create
for people?” asked MIRA’s Kristen Melby. “When
things like these police raids happen, people are afraid to go outside
or send their children to school,” she said.
A large-scaled photo book illustrating the work
of Mexican architect Jose Luis Ezquerra, who invented the “lejanista”
style of architecture, sits on a shelf in Coleman’s University
Avenue headquarters. Lejanista is an artist’s blend of distinct
cultures. The book is inscribed from 2003, “Apreciado, Senor
Norm Coleman, con todo respecto.”
|